Saturday, 26 January 2008

Saddam lied, people died

To the truth-averse left - a tautology if ever there was one - the 'Bush lied, people died' meme has been a major part of what passes for intellectual analysis.

CBS's 60 Minutes turned left some years ago and has become more and more loopy, a demonstrated in recent times with the inane Save The Planet series. For them to broadcast an interview demonstrating what really was going on with Iraq is quite remarkable.
NEW YORK — Saddam Hussein allowed the world to believe he had weapons of mass destruction to deter rival Iran and did not think the United States would stage a major invasion, according to an FBI interrogator who questioned the Iraqi leader after his capture.
Saddam believed that the oil deals he had done with UN Security Council members China, France and Germany, as well as bribes paid to representatives from those countries would protect him from any US action.
Saddam expected only a limited aerial attack by the United States and thought he could remain in control, the FBI special agent, George Piro, told CBS's "60 Minutes" program in an interview to be broadcast Sunday.

"He told me he initially miscalculated ... President Bush's intentions," said Piro. "He thought the United States would retaliate with the same type of attack as we did in 1998 ... a four-day aerial attack."

"He survived that one and he was willing to accept that type of attack," Piro said.

The Associated Press spoke to a close aide of Saddam's in August 2003, who said that Saddam did not expect a U.S. invasion and deliberately kept the world guessing about his weapons program, although he already had gotten rid of it.

Saddam publicly denied having unconventional weapons before the U.S. invasion, but prevented U.N. inspectors from working in the country from 1998 until 2002 and when they finally returned in November 2002, they often complained that Iraq wasn't fully cooperating.

Piro, a Lebanese-American who speaks Arabic, debriefed Saddam after he was found hiding in an underground hideout near his home city north of Baghdad in December 2003, nine months after the U.S. invasion.

Piro said Saddam also said that he wanted to keep up the illusion that he had the program in part because he thought it would deter a likely Iranian invasion.

Anyone with half a brain understood that this must be true when it became clear Saddam had been lying about his weapons program. It's also possible that Iran is playing the same game in reverse. They are now militarily much weaker than Iraq and want to both deter any plans that country might have post-stabilisation, as well as presenting itself as the strong horse in the region.
"For him, it was critical that he was seen as still the strong, defiant Saddam. He thought that (faking having the weapons) would prevent the Iranians from reinvading Iraq," Piro told Scott Pelley of "60 Minutes."

Piro added that Saddam had the intention of restarting an Iraqi weapons program at the time, and had engineers available for chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.
I'm sure that the Daily Kos, Huffington Post etc crowd will deny this one all ways 'til Tuesday.
Piro also mentioned Saddam's revelation during questioning that what pushed him to invade Kuwait in 1990 was a dishonorable swipe at Iraqi women made by the Kuwaiti leader, Sheik Jaber Al Ahmed Al Sabah.

During the buildup to the invasion, Iraq had accused Kuwait of flooding the world market with oil and demanded compensation for oil produced from a disputed area on the border of the two countries.

Piro said that Al Sabah told the foreign minister of Iraq during a discussion aimed at resolving some of those conflicts that "he would not stop doing what he was doing until he turned every Iraqi woman into a $10 prostitute. And that really sealed it for him, to invade Kuwait," said Piro.
Such are the petty things that people go to war for...

(Nothing Follows)

2 comments:

Kevo said...

Jack,

Probably will not register, but a timely historical reminder to those who feel that:

climate change and/or peak oil-cum-resource depletion and/or overpopulation

are failures of liberal democracy

and that 'wartime' power structures and benelovent technocratic rule are the only answer to steer society through 'the crisis de jour'.......

Autocrats have a tendency to listen only to themselves and act in their very narrow view of self interest and national interest as one and the same. This ain't rocket science - anyone opening a history book can see it time and time again.

The catastrophes visited upon the people of both Iraq and Kuwait by the hubris of their autocratic rulers are just a timely example.

But unfortunately as history pre-the fall of the Berlin Wall fades from memory we will hear yet more calls for a Grüner Führer.

Jack Lacton said...

Kevo,

I think that's right. I've got a post working up at the moment about the New Age version of "Viva La Revolution" such as in Cuba and Hitler's call for a new Germany.

The US election has brought to light an ugly word "change" that is truly meaningless but to supporters, especially, of Obama seems to echo the previously used calls for revolution. Certainly, the effect on his supporters is the same whenever he uses the word.